Saturday, April 20, 2013

Islam And Tolerance - Various Episodes


Islam And Tolerance
Treatment of Non-Muslims By The Prophet (May Allah’s Peace and Blessings be Upon Him) of Islam


Please follow Ubqari for more on Islamic spirituality.


By Ibn Zaib Bhikaari

As Muslims we are the followers of an extremely well-mannered Prophet (may Allah’s peace and blessings be upon him). He had an exemplary attitude viz a viz non-Muslims. You read in the previous episodes. Now read about the enlightened lives of his followers. Think, the power of decision rests with you.

Episode 56 – February, 2011

When Hazrat Abu Bakar (RA) sent an army on the expedition of Syria, he addressed the emir of the army: ”You will find a nation which has devoted itself for the worship of Allah. Leave them. I make ten recommendations for you. Do not kill any woman, child, or an old person. Do not cut a fruit bearing tree. Do not ruin a place that is inhabited. Do not slaughter goat or camel without need for eating. Do not burn any oasis. Do not cheat in the property that has been confiscated due to battle. And do not become cowards.

Security of the Rights of Non-Muslims: The countries that were conquered in his time, their non-Muslim population was taken under safety and took complete responsibility for guarding their rights. The rights that were given to non-Muslims by Rasool Allah (may Allah’s peace be upon him) the same were given by him. When Heera was conquered, a pact was made with the christians of that place that their churches and mausoleums will not be demolished. Their that palace will not be demolished in which they hid themselves while competing with the enemy. They will not have any prohibition in knelling and ringing of church bells. On the occasions of religious ceremonies they will not be prohibited to take out their crosses. Any old person who became handicapped for work or someone contracted a severe illness. Or if someone was wealthy in the beginning and then became destitute. From such people taxes would not be charged. And till the time they stayed alive their kin’s needs would be fulfilled from the bait-al-maal. Nonetheless, if they go to another country their relatives’ financial assistance would not be a responsibility of the Muslims. It was also written in this agreement that the non-Mulims would have permission to wear any dress other than the military dress. On the condition that they do not try to imitate the Muslims. The instruction for avoiding imitation was given so that a difference be maintained between Muslims and non-Muslims to give complete security to the latter.

Episode 56 – April, 2011

A slave of hazrat Umar (may Allah be pleased with him) was a christian. He (RA) used to invite him to embrace Islam. But he (RA) never emphasized too much. He (RA) used to say that there is no compulsion in Islam. The slave remained christian throughout his (RA) life.

Hazrat Umar (RA) had blown such a spirit of Islam’s true teachings among his officials and soldiers that non-Muslims of the conquered countries automatically kept on embracing Islam by getting impressed with their fear of Allah, following of sunnah, piety, abstinence, hospitality, helpfulness, behavior, truthfulness, justice, mercy, equality, good treatment of opponents.

When the Muslim army reached Syria, the ambassador of Romans, George, embraced Islam. The emir of of Shitaa, a city of Egypt, embraced Islam with two thousand people. The bishop of Damascus came to hazrat Khalid bin Waleed (may Allah be pleased with him) and embraced Islam in front of him. After the conquest of Jalola the emirs and affluent of that city themselves embraced Islam. After the battle of Qaadsia the royal regiment of Iran embraced Islam with 4000 soldiers. When some army officers of Yazdgird converted to Islam, nations like Siaabcha, Zatt, and Andghaar also embraced Islam. People of a few towns of Egypt also became Muslims. After the conquest of Wimyaat the whole population ranging from Baqaara to Asqalaan embraced Islam. And then who can refuse to accept this reality that the population of the whole territories of Iraq, Syria, Egypt and Iran gradually embraced in such a way that Muslim majority increased in these countries. And those countries became known as Muslim countries. If Muslims had not exhibited the elegant model of their tolerant character there, how would they have embraced Islam. A few people can be pressed and oppressed but to persuade a whole territory with force and terror to a particular religion is against the human nature.

Episode 57 – March, 2011

The accounting of the financial offices of Iraq, Egypt and Syria was kept in their local languages. For this reason, in the era of Hazrat Umar Farooq (RA), the accountants used to be majoosi (fire worshippers?), christians or qatbis. They used to be treated well according to the commands of Hazrat Umar Farooq (RA). Hazrat Umar Farooq (RA) cared about the zimmis (non-Muslims living in Muslim lands) even on his death bed. He said I instruct the caliph who would follow me to treat the zimmis (non-Muslims) well. Whatever truce be made with them, should be well guarded. They should be defended against their enemies well. And they should not be given loads which they cannot bare. He was very punitive about the mistakes of the governors. Once he addressed the people: ”By Allah, I do not send my governors to you so that they should slap on your faces. snatch your property, they are sent because they can teach you your religion and sunnah of Hazrat Muhammad (may Allah’s peace be upon him). If a responsible should treat someone out of the boundaries prescribed by religion and sunnah of Hazrat Muhammad (may Allah’s peace be upon him), I would definitely avenge on behalf of the person that is oppressed. Listening to this Hazrat Amar bin Al-Aas (RA) said that if a Muslim governor gives corrective punishment to his people should he also be fined? Hazrat Umar (RA) said, yes, I will certainly fine him, I have seen Hazrat Muhammad (may Allah’s peace be upon him) paying fines himself.” Hazrat Umar (RA) used to know if a government official used to express his grandeur, did not visit the ill, weak cannot approach his office, and he (RA) used to suspend him. He given instructions to governors that they should not ride Turkish horses, should not wear thin clothings, should not eat sieved flour, should not keep guards on the door, should always keep the doors open for the needy. If someone used to go against these instructions he used to take severe corrective actions against him.

Episode 59 – May, 2011

4.1 Tolerance of Hazrat Usman (May Allah be Pleased With Him)

All the agreements that were made with non-Muslims in the times of Hazrat Umar (RA) were kept in the era of hazrat Usman (RA). And all the new territories that were conquered, the same tolerant spirit was maintained there too. The training of which was given by Rasool Allah (may Allah be pleased with him). He kept on following the holy prophet (may Allah’s peace be upon him) in his every small or big deed. His era remained tormenting due to some reasons. Even then due to the chivalry of Muslims soldiers Taraablas, Algeria, Qabras, Tabristaan and Armenia were conquered. In his time there were also a lot of mutinies. His personality had a lot of softness and regard for others. But he kept on overcoming these mutinies by adopting the strategies of lack of tyranny and blissfulness. In order to be aware of the wellbeing or not of the conquered territories he used to send delegations of notable sahaaba-e-karaam (friends of prohept Muhammad (may Allah’s peace be upon him)). On fridays he wold ask about the circumstances of neighboring countries by reaching the rostrum. And he had made a general announcement that if anyone has any problem with a governor, he should describe that on the occasion of hajj. On this occasion he used to call all the concerned officials so that inquiry of such matters could be done easily.

In his time Muslims did some bad treatments towards the christians of Nijraan. They complained about it to hazrat Usman (RA) by coming to him. At that time the governor of that place was hazrat Waleed bin Utba (RA). Hazrat Usman (RA) wrote to him that the chief of the citizens of Nijraan in Iraq has come to me and complained and showed to me the condition which hazrat Umar (RA) had set with them. I have come to know about the damages Muslims have done to them. I have reduced their taxes. I have given it to them in the way of Allah. And I have given them all the land that hazrat Umar (RA) had agreed with them.

Episode 60 – June, 2011

5.1 Religious Tolerance of Hazrat Ali Al-Murtaza(May Allah Be Pleased With Him)

Hazrat Ali (RA)’s era of caliphate also remained mostly tormenting and vociferous. The period of his caliphate was five years. Due to fights and rebellions he could not achieve that peace of mind which is mandatory for ruling. But he had gotten his grooming under the shadow of Hazrat Muhammad (peace be upon him). That is why about anchoretism, piety, worship, hospitality and good treatment and character whatever good examples can be given all were present in his personality. No contemporary was his equal in chivalry. But he continuously kept on acting on this hadith of Rasool Allah (may peace be upon him) that brave is not the one who defeats his enemy rather brave is the one who can control his nafs (self). This story of his life is very famous. That in one battle he bowled over a jew and sat on his chest. He wanted to kill him that he spat on his face. At once he got away from his chest. The jew got astonished and asked the reason for his getting away. And he said that initially I wanted to kill you for Allah, you spat on my face. If I had killed you now, I would have done it for my nafs (self), which would not have been right. The jew accepted Islam after listening to this.

He remained very popular due to the beauty of his treatment and character. Depending on this quality of his Rasool Allah (may Allah’s peace be upon him) kept on taking the work of spreading Islam continuously. After the conquest of Makkah Hazrat Khalid bin Waleed (RA) was appointed for spreading the message of Islam in banu-Khuzaima. Initially this tribe accepted Islam and then they refused. Hazrat Khalid (RA) imprisoned and killed some of these people. When Rasool Allah (may Allah’s peace be upon him) learnt this, he became sad. You (may Allah’s peace be upon you) had complete confidence in Hazrat Ali’s (RA) performance in dealing with circumstances. That is why you (may Allah’s peace be upon you) sent him to banu-Khuzaima in order to make up for the damage. Hazrat Ali (RA) dealt with the matter with tolerance. Redeemed the prisoners and paid monetary concessions for the people who were killed. (Fateh Albaari)

Episode 61 – July, 2011

6.1 The Good Treatment of Hazrat Ali (RA) Towards Non-Muslims

Once upon a time Hazrat Khalid (may Allah be pleased with him) was sent for the purpose of tableegh (daawaah) to Yemen. He remained unsuccessful there. Rasool Allah (may Allah’s peace and blessings be upon him) chose hazrat Ali (RA) to be sent over there. Hazrat Ali (RA) initially considered this task as difficult. But Hazrat Muhammad (peace be upon him) prayed for him by putting his hand on his chest: ”O Allah! make his tongue truthful and enlighten his heart with the light of hedayet.” After this he tied amaama shareef (turban) on his head and sent him towards Yemen by giving him black knowledge (siyaah ilm?). Hazrat Ali (RA) changed the atmosphere of that place with the beauty of his strategy and treatment in such a way that the whole tribe of Hamdaan converted to Islam. (Fateh-al-Baari, khulafaa-e-raashideen).

Khaarijis kept on continuously conspiring against Hazrat Ali (RA). They kept on provoking majoosis (fire worshippers?), apostates, new-Muslims, and minorities (zimmi?), for mutiny. But Hazrat Ali (RA) handled these mutinies with a lot of patience. When they were subdued, he treated them in a very nice way. Iranian rebels said about his charitable treatment that the method of governance of Ameer-ul-momineen Hazrat Ali (RA) bin Abi-Taalib has made us forget the memory of the governance of Nosheerwaan.

He had maintained and attitude of love and affection with zimmis (minorities?). Hazrat Ali (RA) maintained all the pacts that he had made with them.

The most glorious example of Hazrat Ali’s (RA) charitable treatment is that when his murderer, Ibn-Baljam, was brought to him was brought to his death bed, he said by looking at him: give him good bed, have him sleep on a soft bed. If I remain alive, then I would have the authority to forgive him or to take revenge from him. If I die, I would fight with him in front of Allah. Then he also made this will that he should be avenged softly, that is, his hands or feet should not be cut.

Episode 62 – August, 2011

7.1 The Good Treatment of Hazrat Ali (RA) Towards Non-Muslims

Hazrat Ali (may Allah be pleased with him) did not tolerate the betrayal of right of non-Muslims under any circumstance. When non-muslims complained about the severity and strict handling of one of his officials, Hazrat Amar bin Muslima (RA), he wrote: ”I have come to know that the non-Muslim farmers of your country have problems with your strict attitude. There is nothing better in this. You should handle things both with softness and strictness. But strictness should not reach the limits of oppression. And softness should not reach the limits of loss. Whatever is due to be received from them, yu should receive it. But save yourself from spilling their blood. Similarly, an irrigation canal of non-muslims was ruined. He wrote to the official hazrat Qarz bin Kaab (RA) that it is the duty of the Muslims to rehabilitate the canal. And that I can swear upon my life I like its rehabilitation. Inspite of this that the people living there be exiled.”

Once upon a time the armor of Hazrat Ali (RA) fell somewhere. A christian picked it up. He recognized it as he (RA) saw it. The christian refused to give it. Despite being the caliph of the time hazrat Ali (RA) reported the matter to the Qazi (judge) of the shariah and filed a case. Qazi asked that what proof did he have of the armor being his (RA)? He could not provide any evidence and the Qazi made the judgement in favor of the christian. The christian got impressed by it and said that this justice is like that of prophets. Ameer-ul-momineen (RA) presents me in front of the Qazi to make a judgement and after that the Qazi makes a judgement against him (RA). After that he converted to Islam. When Hazrat Ali (RA) used to send a military convoy somewhere, he used to address them: ”I advise you to acquire the piety of that Allah, with whom you have to ultimately meet. Other than this you cannot have a destination. And he is the lord of this world and the afterlife. Look! The expedition on which you are being sent, make complete arrangements for that. And perform such deeds that will make you near to Allah. Because only those worldly things will be useful, which reach Allah.”

Episode 64 – October, 2011

The jews of khyber adopted such a rebellious attitude that not only did they cheat in the matters of Muslims and tried to spread their destruction rather they threw the son of Hazrat Umar (RA), Hazrat Abdullah (RA), from the top of the roof. Due to this his hands broke. Hazrat Umar (RA) exiled them from Khyber. But in the times of Rasool Allah (may Allah’s peace be upon him) an agreement was made with them that they would be partners in half of the land and half of the yield. Thus, at the time of exile Hazrat Umar (RA) gave them silver and gold equivalent to their shares of half the land and half the yield.

The jews of Fidak also did political mutiny. Hazrat Umar (RA) had made a truce with them on the conditions of exile. That is why at the time of exile he (RA) gave them the justifiable price of whatever shares they had in oasis and land. He sent some acquaintances to set these terms with them and according to the pact whatever price was set with them was given to them.

When hazrat Umar (RA) used to get knowledge of any rebellious conspiracy in his land, he (RA) used to act severely to dissipate it. If this conspiracy used to be from non-muslims, although he would hesitate in punishing them but even in this he used to be merciful and tolerant. When Syria was conquered. On the boundary of it there was a city known as Arboos. A truce was made with the people of this city. But they used to secretly conspire with the Romans of central Asia and used to tell the secrets of Muslims to them. When Hazrat Umar (RA) came to know about this, he wrote to the governor of that place, hazrat Umair bin Saad (RA), to give them a deadline of one year, that they refrain from their conspiracy. And if they do not refrain, their property, land, animals and belongings be counted and the price be given and they be asked to leave. This order was fulfilled.

Episode 66 – December, 2012

In the era of Hazrat Umar (RA) also there remained continuous confrontation with the Romans. And when the chivalrous military chiefs of Hazrat Umar (RA) occupied Damascus, Jordan and Qabas Harqul? was extremely perplexed and horrified. He called his military emirs and asked, ”what is the reason, Arabs are too numerous compared to us in terms of numbers and amunition and even then they become successful.” An experienced person gave an answer for this, ”Arabs have better morals than us. They worship at night and fast during the day. They do not oppress anyone and live with equality amongst each other. In comparison to that our situation is that we drink, indulge in adultery, do not keep promises, and oppress others. The result of this is that, in their every activity they have vigor and perseverance and our activities are void of them.”

In the battle of Fahal when the Romans wished to have a truce they sent a message to the chief of Arabs, Hazrat Abu-Ubaida (RA) that some person should come over as an ambassador. Hazrat Abu-Ubaida (RA) sent Maaz-bin-Jabal (RA). When Hazrat Maaz (RA) reached the camp of the Romans he saw that there was a very expensive floor laid in the tent. He stopped there. A christian came and said, ”I can hold the horse, you please go and sit in the court.” The piety and sacredness of Maaz (RA) was well known. And even the christians were aware of that. That is why they really wanted to respect them. His staying out disturbed them. Maaz (RA) said, ”I do not want to sit on the floor that has been prepared by snatching the rights of the poor.” Saying this he sat on the floor. Christians felt pity and said that they wanted to respect him but if he did not care about it, what could they do. Hazrat Maaz (RA) became angry. He stood on his knees and said, ”what you consider as respect, I do not care about that, if sitting on the floor is a tradition of the slaves, then who can be a bigger servant of Allah than me.” Roman’s were astonished about his carelessness and independence. So much so that a person asked, ”is there a person among Muslims who, in this regard, is more than you?” He said, ”I can swear upon Allah! this is enough that I should not be the worse of all.” Romans kept quiet.

10 Episode 67 – January, 2012

A fireworshipper named Shamoon was a neighbor of Hazrat Hasan Basri (RA). When he neared death, you (RA) went to him and saw that his body had become black due to the smoke of fire. You (RA) advised him to accept Islam by abandoning fire worship. Allah will have mercy! He said that he was nihilist about Islam due to three reasons. First, while according to your beliefs love of the world is a bad thing then why do you struggle for it? Second, when you consider that death is certain then why do you work in the world to attain the will of God? And that considering the certainty of death, why don’t you prepare for it? Third, that when you consider that the river of God’s sight as very special and wonderful, the why do work against the will of God in this world? You (RA) replied that these are deeds and character of the believers (meaning that they do not reflect the teachings of Islam), but what what had he achieved by wasting time in believing in fire worship? A believer, no matter what his character is, after all believes in the unity of God. But you have worshiped fire for seventy years. And if both of us fall in the fire, would it burn both of us equally, or would it have any regard for your worship? but my God has that much power that should He will, the fire cannot give me minutest of the harm. And after saying this, he held fire in his hand and the fire did not affect him at all. Upon getting impressed by this Shamoon said that I have I have indulged in fire worship for seventy years, what would I achieve by becoming a Muslim now? But when you (RA) insisted again to him to accept Islam, he said that he would accept Islam on one condition that you (RA) should write a testimonial for him that after my becoming a Muslim Allah Almighty would forgive all of my sins. You wrote a testimonial to him about this subject. After this Shamoon became a Muslim by the truth of his heart. And he made a request that upon his death you (RA) would wash his body with his hands and lay him down in his grave and place the testimonial in my hand so that on the day of judgement I have a proof about being a believer. And by making this will he recited the testimony of unity and departed from this world. The same night you (RA) saw in a dream that Shamoon is wearing a very expensive dress and is wandering in the heaven. And when you (RA) asked about as to what happened to him? He said God forgave him by virtue of his mercy and what the bounties He bestowed upon him were indescribable. Thus, there is no burden on you (RA) and that you (RA) can take your testimonial back. Because it is not needed now. And when you (RA) woke up in the morning, that testimonial was in your hand.

11 Episode 68 – February, 2012

Hazrat Imran bin Hassain (may Allah be pleased with him) describes an account of a journey that on a night we stayed somewhere. In the morning everyone fell asleep. The prayer was missed. That was offered immediately afterwards. We had run short of water. And we were extremely thirsty. The prophet of Allah (may Allah’s peace and blessings be upon him) sent me with some riders in search of water. When we went out we saw a woman taking two skins of water on her camel. We asked her as to where could the water be found? She said that water was not available in the vicinity. That she had traveled away from her tribe for a day and a night to fetch water. She told that she was a widow and that she had small orphaned children. We took her to the prophet of Allah (may Allah’s peace and blessings be upon him). Upon your (PBUH) order the camel was sat down. You (PBUH) put your hand on the skin. Took a little bit of water and gargled with it. After this Your (PBUH) this miracle was observed that were were 40 people. All of us drank water from it. And whatever, big or small, utensils we had, we filled them all. One person had the need for taking shower. He was given water for that. Despite that it felt that the skins were so full that they were tearing apart. He (PBUH) told that woman, ”look we have not lessened your water.” Then due to Your (PBUH) command we gave her pieces of leftover bread and dates. You (peace be upon you) said, ”go and feed these to your children.” She went to her tribe and told about this incident and everyone accepted Islam.
It is said about Hazrat Umar (may Allah be pleased with him) that during his journey of Syria he took water from the house of a christian woman and performed ablution with it. Imam Shaafi (RA) has quoted this incident that Hazrat Umar (RA) performed ablution by taking water from the pitcher of a christian woman.

12 Episode 69 – March, 2012

Khawaja Moin-ud-din Chishti (may Allah’s blessings be upon him) was in reality Sultan-ul-hind and a bringer of prosperity sage. You were the one who spread light of Islam in the infidel land of India. And for spreading the religion you spread a network of your caliphs and scholars of spiritual knowledge in every corner of India. They started brining non-Muslims under the shadow of the teachings of Islam. You were not only a dignified wali (friend of Allah) rather you were India’s biggest and first Muslim leader with whose leadership not only that in the dark and infidel-nourishing corners of the land of India Islamic lights were lit, rather a Muslim dynasty was also established.

When Khawaja Moin-ud-din Chishti (RA) came to Delhi in the beginning, a person, hiding a knife under his armpit, attacked with the intention of killing him. Hazrat Khawaja Moin-ud-din Chishti (RA) lovingly said, ”since you have come, finish your job.” The infidel started quivering as soon as he heard these words. He fell in the feet and accepted Islam instantaneously. Seeing this wonder many other people also became Muslims.

13 Episode 70 – April, 2012

A fire worshipper named Behram used to live in the neighborhood of Hazrat Ahmad bin Hizb (RA). He was a big merchant. Once in the way robbers looted all of his property. When you heard about this you felt very sad. He said to his disciples, ”what if he is a non-Muslim. He is our neighbor. It is mandatory for us to console him. Let’s go and and console him. He is very sad.” Thus, you went to his house. He also respected you (RA) a lot. And took you (RA) in the house and sat you in a well decorated room. Since it was a time of severe famine, formalities were made, but he thought that may be you (RA) have come to eat something. You (RA) understood from your enlightened self and said, ”Behram, be comfortable. We have not come here to eat and drink. We have just come here to console you. We heard about your great loss.” He said, ”indeed my belongings were looted and I had a grave loss. But still there are three things for which it is mandatory for me to be thankful.” Firstly, I was looted but I did not loot anyone. Secondly, half of my belongings are still left with me. Thirdly, that worldly belongings were looted, belongings of the afterlife were saved.” You (RA) said to your disciples that his sayings have a smell of friendship. Then you (RA) asked that tell us that why do you people worship fire? He said that only so that on the day of judgement I remain safe from it. You (RA) said, ”you are worshipping it since a long time. And I could not understand its significance even for a single day. Come! let’s both of us put hands in it. We will get to know as to how much it spares you.” This suggestion struck Behram’s heart a little bit. He said, ”Ok explain four affairs to me. Why did Allah brought to life His creation?” You (RA) said, ”Creation was given birth so that it could recognize its creator. Sustenance was given so that they could know Him due to it. Death was given so that they could recognize Him by the virtue of His (Qahaari?). Then brought back to life so that they could recognize him by the virtue of His nature.” Behram said, ”Ok bring forward this fire and let’s test it too.” You (RA) put your hand in it and no harm happened. Behram embraced Islam at that point.

14 Episode 71 – May, 2012

Hazrat Kabeer-ul-Aulia, Sheikh Jalal-ud-din (RA) was very wealthy and a rich person of his time. And your father, Khawaja Mehmood (RA)’s wealth also did not have any measure. You (RA) were renowned for your knowledge and benevolence. From childhood you (RA) used to get upset about anyone’s problem. And till the time you (RA) would not solve his problem you (RA) would remain restless. You (RA) used to help poor and the needy a lot. You (RA) were very charitable and you had this habit till the end. You belonged to Paani Patt. You (RA) had not reached adolescence yet that you started developing mystic states. You (RA) would go to jungles and remain busy in worships there. When hazrat Sheikh Shams-ud-din (RA) made you a caliph he (RA) prayed for you (RA), ”Jalali! I give you this and that.” This meant that blessings of both life and afterlife were prayed to be bestowed upon him.

Thousands of people benefited from you (RA). Islam and the purpose of Islam benefited a lot. Plenty of hindus accepted Islam on your hands. You (RA) reached a mountain while touring, you (RA) saw that a hindu yogi was sitting still while his eyes were closed. When you (RA) reached near you gave movement to his heart. He opened his eyes. And gave you a piece of Paaras? (a gem) happily. You (RA) threw it in water while smiling. He did not like this act. He said, ”you (RA) did not value this priceless thing. I do not know give me my stone back. Otherwise I will not let you lift even a single foot from here.” And he behaved with severe insolence in front of you (RA). But you (RA) while exhibiting a good behavior went down into the spring and said, ”come pick your stone up.” What he saw was that there thousands of such stones (gems) were lying. You (RA) smiled and said, ”When respectful people of Allah look at any stone it becomes paaras (gem).” When he saw this wonder and the beautiful behavior he converted to Islam instantaneously. Then in his vicinity all of his disciples also converted to Islam. This yogi became a firm and a complete believer.

15 Episode 72 – June, 2012

15.1 The Beauty of Treatment of Saaien Tawakkal Shah Anbaalwi

In the character of Hazrat Shah Sahib (RA) many incidents can be found that show that he used to have a lot of affection on the creation of Allah. This did not have any discrimination of Hindu, Muslim, Sikh or Christian. A part of this affection was hadayet (guidance) too. He would meet everyone openheartedly. And he had a catch phrase, ”O banday Allah dai” (O man of Allah). He used to address the others with this.

Care for a Hindu Neighbor: You had so much regard for the punctuality of sunnah of Hazrat Muhammad (PBUH) that once in the neighborhood a Hindu died. You did not eat food till the time he was taken out for cremation. He said that he was a neighbor and when the neighbors are in sorrow food should be eaten by getting separate from them. This, he went to the mosque and ate a little bit of rice over there.

16 Episode 73 – July, 2012

The inhabitants of Egypt were given complete independence in the matters of religious affairs. They were assured about the safety of life, property and personal respect. So much so that the great bishop of christians, Benjamin, who was in hiding due to the fear of the Romans, Hazrat Amar bin Alaas (may Allah be pleased with Him) invited him and appointed him on his designation. And about churches whatever concessions were asked were granted. On gaining religious independence Christians celebrated a lot and speeches were made in the churches. Asqaf Baasili said, ”After a long oppression of Romans, I am seeing an era of redemption and peace in Alexandria today.” In the eyes of the Muslims jews, christians, polytheists and fire-worshippers were all equal. And muslims used to treat everyone with sympathy and love. After seeing the beauty of behavior of Muslims, myriads of non-Muslims adopted Islam and by the passage of time they started adopting Arabic language too. The result of this was this that in future eras Egypt became a center of Islamic culture and civilization. When Muslims conquered Alexandria, an arrow of a person belonging to the Muslim Army accidentally broke an eye of the statue of Hazrat Isa (may Allah’s peace be upon Him) (Jesus Christ). This incident deeply agonized the Christians. They went to the chief of the Muslim Army, Hazrat Amar-bin-Alaas (may Allah be pleased with Him), and said, ”your man has broke an eye of the statue of Jesus Christ (Hazrat Isa (AS)). You should also make a statue of your prophet (may Allah’s peace and blessings be upon Him). And we would break an eye of that statue in return.” The chief of the Muslims said, ”this sounds like a foolish idea. It would be better that instead of breaking the eye of the statue, you should break the eye of a Muslim soldier.” A christian agreed to do this. The chief of the muslims himself gave him his dagger and said, ”my eye is presented here, you can break it.” Seeing this justice of the chief of Muslims the dagger dropped down from the hands of the christian and he refrained from this act.

17 Episode 74 – August, 2012

It is described in Israr-at-Tauheed that one day Abu-Saeed Abu-Al-Khair (RA) was passing through a street with a group of people. A woman was throwing the ash of her stove from the top of her roof. Some ash fell on Sheikh’s clothes. Sheikh was not affected by this incident at all. But his companions became severely angry. And they felt about asking the man of the house. Sheikh said that they should not become angry. Only ash has fallen on the person who deserved fire. This time is appropriate for thanking Allah instead. Everyone became quiet by listening to this. And no one harmed any one.

Hazrat Ba-Yazeed (RA) was passing through a graveyard. A Bistaami young man was playing a musical instrument. You recite Laa-hola-waala after seeing him. That young man struck his instrument so severely on hazrat’s head that his head got wounded. And the instrument also broke. You came back to your house and sent to him the price of the instrument and a little bit of sweet. And also sent this message to buy a new instrument from that money and eat sweet so that the sorrow of broken instrument may go away. When the young man got this message he felt very ashamed. He came back to sheikh and asked for forgiveness.

18 Episode 75, September, 2012

The historian of Islam ibn-e-Khuldoon writes that Hazrat Amar bin Al-Aas (RA) used to sit on the floor with the common people of his palace in Egypt. When Maqooqas (king of Egypt) used to come to him (RA), potters used to carry former’s throne. And he used to sit on his throne like kings with Hazrat Amar bin Al-Aas (RA). Because Maqsoos was a zimmi? (non-Muslim) and the Muslims used to care about their truces and pacts. And worldly glory so far had not gained any value in their eyes. So on this act of Maqsoos nobody criticized.

Hazrat Abu-Ubaida (RA) took bait-al-maqdas under siege. On getting anxious about the siege the priests of bait-al-maqdas made a truce on this condition that the conditions for truce be set through the caliph himself. Thus, on invitation of Hazrat Abu Ubaida (RA) Ameer-ul-momineen Hazrat Umar Farooq (RA) went to bait-al-maqdas. When ameer-ul-momineen went close to the city of Jerusalem, a christian came to you. And said, ”I am a zimmi (a non-Muslim living in a Muslim country) and this is my garden in front. Some people of your army are harming.” Ameer-ul-momineen went close to the garden and saw that some people were taking grapes away from the garden. Ameer-ul-momineen stopped those people. They said that they were hungry. Hazrat Umar (RA) went inside the garden and found some people there too. He (RA) called that zimmi (non-Muslim) to himself and asked about the price of the garden and paid him the price.

19 Episode 77 – November, 2012

When Ameer-ul-momineen hazrat Umar (RA) went to the church of Kaneesa and the time of prayers approached there, he said to Venice Batareeq, ”I want to offer my prayers.” Batareeq replied, ”Ameer-ul-momineen, you can offer your prayers here.” You (RA) refused to do so. Batareeq went to the church of Constantinople, but you (RA) did not offer your prayers there too. You (RA) offered your prayers outside the church in front of the door. And said to Batareeque that I did not offer the prayers inside the church so that in future Muslims do not capture the church following the logic that Umar (RA) had prayed there. After that you (RA) wrote a letter and gave it to Batareeque. In which it was written, ”Any Muslim cannot pray in the church with Azaan and jamaa (as a group prayer), although he can pray alone.”

Hazrat Khalid bin Waleed (may Allah be pleased with him) made a peace agreement with the priest of Ghaanaat on the following conditions. (1) Their temples not be destroyed. (2) They should be able to ring their bells and display crosses on their religious festivals whenever they like, during the day or night, but not during the times of the prayers.

While playing polo a rich Qatbi man advanced his horse further from that of governor of Egypt, hazrat Amar bin Alaas (RA). The son of Hazrat Amar bin Alaas (RA) angrily beat the rich man with a whip. The rich man went to Madina Munawara and complained about it to ameer-ul-momineen hazrat Umar (RA). Ameer-ul-momineen (RA) called both the father and the son from Egypt and gave a whip in the hands of the rich man and said, whoever of these has beaten you, you can also beat him. The rich man whipped hazrat Abullah (RA). Hazrat Umar (RA) pointed towards Hazrat Amar-bin-Alaas (RA) and said, ”on him too”. The rich man said, ”no, he is my mentor.”

20 Episode 76, October, 2012

The peace treaty that was written through Ameer-ul-Momineen, Hazrat Umar Farooq (may Allah be pleased with him) for the inhabitants of Bayt al-Muqdis (Jerusalem) had written in it: ”The life, property, churches, cross, sick, healthy of inhabitants of Aelya and Bayt al-Muqdis all are given peace . Habitation in their temples is forbidden. And neither should they be demolished. So much so that even their enclosures would not be harmed. Nor would any deficiency be made in their crosses or properties. Nor would any torture be done as regards their religion.

Misho? writes about the history of crusades that, ”When Hazrat Umar (may Allah be pleased with him) conquered Bayt -al-Muqdus he didnot give any hardship to the christians. Contrary to this when crusaders conquered this city they extremely ruthlessly committed genocide of Muslims and burnt the Jews.

Renowned English Historian Gibbon writes: ”Caliph Umar (may Allah be pleased with him) indeed conquered Bayt al-Muqdus, but neither did he torture the inhabitants of the city nor did he interfere in their religion. A part of the city was set aside for christians, priests, and cardinal bishop(?). For the security of this christians only had to pay 2 Dinaar annually. Instead of stopping the pilgrimage to Bayt al-Muqdus, Muslims facilitated it so that due to visiting business could be flourished. After 460 years of this when this sacred city went back into the hands of European Christians, the eastern Christians used to miss and remember the tolerant governance of the Arab Caliphs.

21 Episode 78 – December, 2012

21.1 Treatment of Non-Muslims in the Time of Treason and Revolt

Foreign nations are complete strangers. In the time of treason and revolt even the most civilized of the empires cannot do any favors even to its own people. But Sahaaba (friends of Prophet of Allah (may Allah’s peace and blessings be upon him)) (may Allah be pleased with them) treated the minorities even under such circumstances with extreme politeness. On the extreme border of Syria there was a city Areesus. The Muslims had signed a peace treaty with the Christians living there. But these Christians conspired covertly with the roman and used to convey the news of Muslims to them. When Hazrat Umair bin Saad (may Allah be pleased with him), who was the governor of that place, informed about it to Hazrat Umar-e-Farooq (may Allah be pleased with him), he replied back in writing that the inhabitants be given twice the worth of their property and belongings and then they should be exiled. If they do not agree to this, they should be given a time of one year. Thus, after one year they were sent in to exile. These favors and amenities had such an effect on the minorities that they became supporters of Muslims themselves. Although Romans were themselves of the same religion as the Christians, when Romans made preparations for a great and decisive battle against the Muslims, these minority Christians sent their spies from all over to gain information about the Romans. The governors, that Hazrat Abu Ubaidah (may Allah be pleased with him) had appointed in every city, were approached by affluent christians from every city and reported about this bellicose preparation. When all the governors reported about this news to Hazrat Abu Ubaidah bin Jarrah (may Allah be pleased with him), he wrote back that all the tax that had been collected by the minorities be returned, because according to the treaty the security of latter was a responsibility of the Muslims and that they did not possess the means to do so at that time. When these officials returned these amounts back, the minorities were deeply impressed and exclaimed that, ”May God bring you back, if Romans had themselves been in this situation they would not have returned the tax back, rather they would have taken whatever was ours” When the Muslims won the christians themselves returned the money so that they could come under the shade of this blissful rain again.

22 Episode 79 – February, 2013

22.1 Forgiveness and Mercy and Benevolence Towards Enemies

Sufia-e-karaam (may Allah shower His blessings on them) have always adopted the attitude of forgiveness with the creation of Allah, muslim and non-muslim. This had a very good effect on the social environment. Once hazrat Malik bin Deenaar (RA) rented a house in the neighborhood of a jew. Your cottage was adjoining with the door of the jew. Thus, the jew made such a pipe out of enmity through which through which he used to pour all the filth in to your house. And the place of your prayer used to become dirty. You (RA) never complained. Once day the jew himself started saying, ”Do you have a problem due to my pipe?” You (RA) said, ”I clean the filth that comes out of the pipe every day. So I do not have any problem.” The jew said, ”You do not get angry even after bearing with so much filth. Your religion is definitely true.” (Tazkira-tul-Aulia, p, 27).

One of the guests of hazrat Nizam-ud-din Aulia (RA) said, ”Some ill-religious, your ill-wishers bad mouth about you everywhere, which we cannot listen.” You (RA) said, ”I have forgiven everyone, you should also forgive them. Do not argue with such people.”

Encouragement and Affection: In front of Sufia-e-karam (RA) there no better deed than encouragement, affection, and to provide happiness to others. Hazrat Junaid Baghdadi (RA) went to a person with a few dirhams. He said that he did not need them. You (RA) said, ”You do not need them but I am a Muslim. If you will accept them I will feel happy. So you should accept them to make me happy.” (kitab-ul-Alhuma, p, 263).

Please follow Ubqari for more on Islamic spirituality.

Monday, December 24, 2012

Tolerence: A Principle of Nature


Following article in the December, 2012 issue of Ubqari is particularly interesting. This was written by Maulana Waheed-ud-deen Khan.

Tolerance is a universal principle of the nature. Both lion and elephant are big animals. Both have the capacity of being rivals of each other. Even then they coexist in the jungle together. This is only possible due to tolerance. Thus, it has been seen in the jungle that if from one side an elephant is coming and from another a lion is coming, both of them pass by and take their directions quietly, without confronting each other. If they do not tolerate each other like this, both of them will start fighting with each other to the point of their mutual destruction.

Nature has taught this method to the lion and elephant. Similarly, nature has developed a capacity for tolerance in human body too. This is known as biological tolerance in medical science. It means an ability of the animalistic body, that without taking negative effects from a certain thing, it can tolerate a connection with it, or an insertion of it in the body.

The whole mechanism of curing diseases is based on this ability. At the time of illness, such medicines are admitted in the body that are collectively bad for the body. But despite its sensitivity to the foreign things, the body endures these medicines. This is done due to tolerance. This becomes possible due to this biological tolerance that these medicines enter the body and show their effect. That they can can affect the intended organ positively without negatively affecting other organs of the body. Similar procedure of tolerance is sought in the human society too. What wild animals do according to their instincts and what the human body does according to the nature, should be done by the human beings according to their consciousness. They should spend their lives with other according to a planned decision and by adopting the procedure of tolerance.

Similarly this is also very interesting: "why are animals so "gentlemanly or ladylike" in contests for resources?" This was a problem that leading ethologists Niko Tinbergen and Konrad Lorenz were trying to address. Tinbergen proposed that such behavior exists for the benefit of the species. I found it interesting while reading about evolutionary game theory a couple of years ago.

Ubqari Magazine



Do Not Forget to Read the Special Edition of January

Those who are engulfed in familial problems should definitely read it.

Reserve your copy today.

Such unanswerable tested easy wazaaif that will be more effective than the atom bomb…. In the price of the magazine, meaning 40 rupees, you can easily buy this special edition.

Only hopeless people who have been dejected from everywhere and are weeping tears of blood should read it. Others should not read it. Blockage of marriage, pursuit of sustenance, unfulfilled wish of traveling abroad, blockage in business, impossible familial puzzles, incurable diseases, families stung with black magic, people defeated with mischiefs of jinns, effects of evil eyes, disobedience of children, mischiefs of jealous enemies, familial misunderstandings, blockages in relationships, blockage in health, doom in business, seekers of wilaayat (friendship with Allah), for all such people wonderful Aulia Karaam (friends of Allah), successful practitioners and simpleminded readers' simple but effective and tested writings and experiences who consider hiding their wazaaif and experiences a curse for their graves.

Come! keep your notebook ready, find the green marker, because the rising bright sun of January 2013 is bringing such effective writings which will persuade you to react in awe. You will be forced to turn your side as soon as you read it. When will the waiting time end depends upon your desire.

Note: People and families suffering from blockages of any type; magical blockage, blockage pertaining to jinn or blockage due to evil eye, whether it is familial or since ever, please do not loose hope. Do not forget to read these gifts absolutely free!!! 

Follow Ubqari on Facebook and Twitter.

Saturday, December 22, 2012

Spiritual Shower

To maintain health, prosperity and a peaceful life and to get rid of illness, once sick, are important necessities of human nature. The diseases contracted by human beings are of both types; spiritual and physical. The healing cure of both types of illnesses is given in Quran-e-hakeem and Ahadith-e-mubarka.

Islam is a pure religion and prefers cleanliness and hygiene. That is why ablution has been ordered along with five diurnal prayers. And it has been ordered to wash those parts of the body that get dirty frequently. And then taking a bath has been made obligatory at least once in a week so that the whole body becomes neat and clean. The wonderful spiritual shower of Aulia Allah (friends of Allah) is such a powerful deed that contains the saying of Allah, meaning aayahs of Quran-e-hakeem and the procedure of the Prophet of Allah, Hazrat Muhammad (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him).That is why it is a flawless and tested deed for every illness and worry. Thousands have tested it and you are also requested to test it with the power of belief. Allah almighty definitely accepts the deed which has strength in it.
The procedure of spiritual shower is that the last six surahs of Quran-e-hakeem be recited with tasmiya and by reciting dared sharif before and after reciting the surahs three times each. And after that recite the prayer of entering the wash room.

بِسْمِ اللہِ اَللّٰھُمَّ اِ نِّیْ اَ عُوْذُبِکَ مِنَ الْخُبْثِ وَالْخَبَاءِثِ
Translation: In the name of Allah, O Allah. I seek refuge in You from the male female evil and Jinns

After reciting this enter the washroom using your left foot. Take the shower according to the sunnah. While bathing keep reciting the above mentioned prayer in your heart. Do not recite with your tongue at all. And imagine about whatever illness or worry you have and think that that is also cleaning and getting away with that. After this when you come out, do it with your right foot and recite the prayer of coming out of the washroom/toilet.

غُفْرَانَكَ الْحَمْدُ لِلَّهِ الَّذِي أَذْهَبَ عَنِّي الْأَذَى وَعَافَانِي

Translation: (O Allah) I seek forgiveness and pardon from You. All Praise be to Allah, who removed the difficulty from me and gave me ease (relief)


And then after this recite the last six surahs of Quran-e-hakeem in the same manner as described above. Beging and end by reciting dared sharif three times.
The last six surahs are as follows: (1) Surah Kaafiroon, (2) Surah Nasar (3) Surah Lahab (4) Surah Ikhlas (5) Surah Falaq (6) Surah Naas. These can also be downloaded from the following link as an mp3 file.

Check this out on Chirbit
Note: Please do not recite the six surahs before going to the washroom if you wish to have ghusal-e-janabat, that is a shower to remove impurity. In that case, recite the surahs twice after coming out of the washroom.

Please follow Ubqari for more on Islamic spirituality.

Friday, December 21, 2012

Healing With Meditation

While meditation has remained a source of spiritual enhancement and a solution of worldly problems since ever, modern science has also endorsed it as a cure for illnesses and diseases. After thousands of experiences "healing with meditation" is offered for the readers of Ubqari. While going to sleep, it is much better to perform ablution and to be clean and pure, otherwise in any situation, sit on the bed for ten minutes and recite Ya Allah-o, Ya Rehman-o, Ya Raheem-o, Ya Hayyu, Ya-Qayuum-o innumerable (preferably more than 500) times. Recite Durood Sharif 3 times before beginning and end and lie down on the bed. By keeping in mind the problem or illness that affects you, and you want it to end, imagine that from the sky a golden light is entering into my whole body through my head and is terminating my illness or solving my problem. And by the blessing of this wazifa  I have been redeemed of this problem completely. So much so that by persistent repetition of this imagination you go to sleep.In the beginning you will find it difficult to stretch this imagination. But after a while when the wonders of meditation will be revealed to you, the unique world of wonders and 100% cure of the problems will astonish you. Do not forget to write to us about your feelings, benefits and unique experiences after meditation. 


Please follow Ubqari for more on Islamic spirituality.

Tuesday, December 04, 2012

Wishful Thinking

Consider a person who is himself a neurosurgeon, and due to some odd illness, he has to undergo clinical comma. During the coma he has visions of a paradise full of angels, palaces, birds chirping and cherubic kids. Clearly, he is in heaven. It does not matter whether he had those visions while he was in coma, or while he was entering that state of coma, or while he was coming out. What matters is that what he saw was a function of his religious upbringing in this earthly life, and what he saw was what he wanted to see. This is a result of his wishful thinking.

Consider another person. For some odd reason he wants to create violence of a huge magnitude. In return for that he has the promise of rewards of an otherworldly life. That no matter how much his past life was messed up by events over which he had no control, he has a bright chance of resting in peace in a heaven. Whether or not he will go to heaven will depend upon what happens to him once he is dead. His motivations have, however, ensued from wishful thinking.

Consider yet another person. He saw all the mess that real world is and grew up to become an agnostic. He studied neuroscience and developed a theory that heaven and hell exist only but in the mind. That when people die they live in an eternal oblivion. That a dead person is as good as an unborn person. That the idea that if you do good deeds, you go to heaven, and that if you do bad deeds, you go to a hell, is a product of wishful thinking. His desire for there being nothing after death is also wishful thinking.

Saturday, December 01, 2012

Wisdom of the Alchemist

I read Paulo Coelho's, "The Alchemist" back in year 2000. It was given to me by a friend, Salman Ateeque, who lives somewhere in Africa now. The book has many wise anecdotes told by the Alchemist to Santiago. I am writing one here from memory and it is followed by what I thought about it then. The story is not stated here verbatim as I tend to forget bits of it but the central theme and details are hopefully true.

Somewhere in the middle of the book the Alchemist tells Santiago a story of a person who used to live in the Roman Empire. The person had a dream in which, possibly an angel, told him that one of his two sons would grow up to be very famous. When the man woke up he thought that it would be the poet son who would become famous for his poetry and it could not be the other son as he was in the army. It turned out the the son who was in the army progressed to become a centurion. And on a military campaign when one of his soldiers got badly injured he was advised by his fellow men to travel to middle east to a man who cured lepers. The centurion did so and eventually met Jesus Christ (probably but I am not sure, it could some other religious figure). He begged Jesus for his soldier's health and the words he used latter became a prayer. That was the reason for his fame.

At that time two things surprised me. The first was that as the father saw the dream he suspected the poet to be famous. It was strange for me to imagine that the father would think like that. For me it was natural to think that the one in army would become famous. After all army officials get to positions of prestige eventually and Roman Empire, for the large part, was a military oriented regime. It was strange to think that father would consider the poet to be lucky. But that probably owes to the fact that I am from Pakistan, where the profession of armed forces is considered much prestigious.

The other thing I inferred was that it is not necessary that whatever one thinks would come out to be true. The father thought about one son, whereas the other one became famous. This can be observed normally in rural areas of Pakistan when parents normally decide as to what the son is destined to do when he grows up even while the son is in the cradle. And depending upon the looks of the child he/she is either sent to a better school or a not so good one. And normally the instrument used for this judgement is the wise gaze of an elderly paternal figure.

Doom of the Jinn

Much earlier in my life, like when I was 6 or 7 years old, I saw a play on television titled "jinn ka zawwaal", which literally means "Doom of the Jinn". The play was symbolic and had the following plot.

A funny looking lean guy is sitting in his room with a lamp in his hand. He rubs the lamp and all of a sudden a giant, scary looking, really big, black man with horns in his head and a painted face appears in front of the lean guy and asks in his rather loud voice. "What can I do for you my master". Clearly, he is a jinn. The owner of the lamp, at first, gets frightened at his sudden appearance and shivers. The jinn tries to calm him down and somehow convinces him that he is his subservient as he owns the lamp and would do anything he demanded of him. After a while, after regaining composure, the gaunt guy, due to lack of a better idea, asked him to iron the clothes. The jinn got confused a little but then fulfilled the wish and disappeared.

As the play progressed the gaunt guy found an interest in the utility of the jinn and kept on rubbing the lamp again and again. And every time the jinn appeared before him and asked for his command, the gaunt guy told him to do trivial things, such as washing the clothes, polishing the shoes and doing the dishes. After a few episode breaks and after a few appearances the jinn started shrinking in size. By the end of the play he stood in the corner of the room having a size of a midget, pale and melancholic, ironing the clothes. The play subsequently ended. At that time it was more funny than horrific.

The play was probably symbolic in nature, as I latter thought about it as I grew older, like in the mid twenties. To me the jinn was probably synonymous for other things, such as mental faculties. As opposed to doing things such as polishing the shoes, the jinn expected to be building castles with in the blink of an eye, or to aid in long distance traveling in a really short period of time. As the gaunt guy was using him for trivial things such as polishing the shoes, the jinn not only got depressed, he also started shrinking. Such is probably the case with human expansive abilities.

At that time scripts for plays and drama serials were written with much creative vigor by people who used to obtain formal training in poetic and prosaic literature. The play was cast on Pakistan Television.

Thursday, November 29, 2012

Random Thoughts About Occasionalism and Science

I recently read the article titled Why The Arabic World Turned Away From Science written by Hillel Ofek. I found it very interesting and a stampede of thoughts and ideas rushed through my mind. Following are some random thoughts about it. I hope to organize them in a better way in future.


But there is another vantage point to it. The Greek science was not rubbish at all. Actually, if nothing else, modern days' scientific method has its roots in Greek Science. Consider the necessity of theorem proving, for instance. While contemporary world was also a lot more advanced, such as the engineering acumen of Egyptians, who raised monumental pyramids, only Greeks made the science flourish by necessitating the adoption of some scientific method. Greeks were genuine thinkers.
This is not to say that Muslims were not. Imam Al-Ghazali was a skeptic of sorts for a considerable period of his life. He eventually proposed occasionalism. The latter means that every single thing and action happens in the universe by the direct and immediate will of God (i.e. Allah, in an Islamic context). This means, for instance, that incidents like hurricane Sandy happen by the direct will of God. Western science states that laws of Physics dictate such events. Occasionalism suggests that laws of physics may be suggested as causes effecting such events. But at the core of them direct will of Allah is responsible for them and the laws of Physics are only used as covers to conceal the divine hand. West frowns upon such ideas. Indeed, even in the midst of such events one can hear Western intellect shouting that the idea that a divine will is responsible for all such events is ridiculous. I know Western skeptics say this even while they are dying. Muslims (and also Christians and possibly also Jews), on the other hand, suggest that the reason behind such events is moral decadency, such as homosexuality and lesbianism.
A belief in occasionalism also has a consequence for the Islamic belief system. This becomes evident when natural disasters like floods and earth quakes strike Muslims countries. In wake of such events, the Western intellect ridiculously asks the Muslims that why is this happening to Muslims and claims that there is no God. Surprisingly, the theology of Islam has an answer for this too; moral decadency of the society. And this is where the debate starts lurching into other extreme dimensions.
    The question is whether Muslims should read philosophy or not. Our times suggest that we should do it. Imam Ghazali suggests that we should not do it. The main reason is that it can lead the Muslims away from piety. Indeed, the propensities of philosophers and the nature of the subject is such that it leads the pupil away from firm belief and lead to heresy. For, if a Muslim was not to pose and address the most arch-question of philosophy, "Does God exist?", he could be lured in to addressing the following question, "Does devil exist?". Or there could be other dodgy questions, investigation of which would at least sway the Muslim away from performing diurnal rituals.

    West has a problem with the way religious people think. While the Muslims, for instance, use all the ifs and buts of logic to show the superiority of their theology, the Western intellect uses them to address the most primordial questions about existence of God. This causes a friction of ideologies. While a Muslim (or a Christian for that matter) would be highly inclined to circumscribe and direct his theses and arguments in a way that eventually find that God exists, philosophers and free thinkers have a genuine problem with that predisposed way of thinking which clearly inhibits free inquiry. This is absolutely understandable. 
    Coincidentally there is now much evidence that human consciousness survives bodily death. A lot of evidence about this can be found in Western literature about spiritualism and near death experiments. This is obviously no proof for the existence of God. Stated in other words, the fact that human beings have ever lasting souls is by no means a proof of existence of a God. Human beings could possibly just have souls just like they have bodies. I would not be surprised to hear one day of emergence of a theory concerning evolution of human souls. But if the evidence that suggests that human beings have souls is true does point to the possible truth of religion, which after all is all about afterlife and souls. This again does not point us to the truth of a single religion. All religions have mentions of souls and afterlives within them. And a keen adherence to the spirit of science demands that we stick the necessities of evidence and proofs. Evidence and proof are indeed two strong pillars of science.
    Meet an average European guy, who is possibly also a student of sociology. Ask him about his views on religion and he would say that religion is wrong. This is suggested because of sociological reasons. For one of the things religion is considered important that historically it has been a vital tool in organizing the society. West wants to get rid of this crutch. Western intellect claims that society could be organized by adopting means from other ecological systems. Study apes, for instance, and we can learn to make peaceful and prosperous communities. But organizing the society is and has possibly been one trivial utility of the society. The main speciality of religion is afterlife. It is to meet this end successfully that religion has other arenas pertaining to the worldly social life. And if there is indeed an afterlife, religion becomes all the more significant. Organized religion may as well be wrong, specially if there is no afterlife. But I have a propensity that if any organized religion stands a chance for being right, it has to be Islam as it is the most organized of them all. I make this claim based on empiricism in some sense. Islam has already addressed every thing. This includes Christianity, Judaism, Idolatry, polytheism, atheism and all the philosophical intellect. This has been done in Quran. And Allah invites every human being to convert to Islam. This is done by frightening, by encouraging, by showing great rewards, by showing that He is merciful and extremely punitive at the same time and by showing them signs. Muslims are advised to invite others to Islam and to amend their own ways in the meantime. In the meantime they have been consciously advised not to use force of any sorts. For there is no compulsion in the religion. The greater emphasis is on the Muslims to live according to the tenets of Islam in this ephemeral worldly life. In the mean time they have also been advised to resist any force that tries to sway them away from achieving their otherworldly goals. This is called Jehad. The smaller and the bigger jehad. Which, of course, Muslims have not been doing very well.

    On a separate note, Ubqari is a non profit organization that invites people to the religion of Islam. There are many prayers and Islamic medicines that can be found here. By and large Pakistanis browse the website the most. The second largest number of people who browse the website are from the United States of America, the third largest from from Saudi Arabia and the Fourth Largest from the U.K. There are many healing methods that are taught, such as Islamic sufi meditation. The message of the organization is not that of terrorism at all, but a genuine effort to attract the humanity to the religion of Islam. I would like to assert here that organization does not teach Muslims to hate non-Muslims. I am privy to this as I have heard many lectures of Hazrat Daamat Barkaatam Allama Hakeem Tariq Mehmood Chughtai. I have to force this point because I have read many Western accounts, specially those of Sam Harris, which claim that Islam spreads hatred. This is not true. I have heard Hazrat crying in combined prayers for infidels too. Islam is not a hate based religion. Besides, mostly average Muslims genuinely love the Western people. Indeed, this is because of the general attitude of the Western people which makes them so adorable. Even if you don't like it, Islam is worth reading and understanding.

    Saturday, November 17, 2012

    A Consequence of the Innocence

    All of us know what sort of a purpose movies like the innocence of the Muslims and caricatures of that kind serve. They uproot the Muslim world, violence happens, and a lot of mess is made. For certain elements, specially in the West, it is a litmus test of the volatile temperament of the Muslim world. But such events play another very cogent role. That is conversion. Events such as these draw attention of many people to the religion of Islam. Indeed, many are converted as a result of their curious study of the religion of Islam and its Prophet, Muhammad (May peace and blessings of Allah be upon him).

    This idea struck me after an encounter with a Danish convert in Copenhagen once upon a time. The person was in his sixties and converted to Islam after a keen study of the religion as a consequence of the Danish cartoon controversy. I tend to forget the name of the person but I do remember that he talked to us (myself and another guy) about logical reasons why Islam prohibited certain things, for instance, homosexuality and lesbianism. He was a kind man, as normally Europeans are.

    Europeans are extremely nice people generally. It is not hard to find a kind hearted person in most of the European countries in one's daily life. Be it your taxi driver, the person standing on the cash counter, or a work place colleague. A myriad of gestures of kindness is not difficult to receive. People are generally a lot more open-minded too, specially compared with the mindsets of the underdeveloped world. Work ethic is Western countries is specially commendable. European laws, regulations and culture are such that it is not difficult to integrate. Such are the reasons for European counties to be favorite destinations for many to seek work. 

    Muslim countries in particular, and Asian and African countries in general, need to learn a great deal from the attitudes of the West. Indeed, West is considered a role model in so many spheres of our lives. Muslims have a propensity towards looking up to West or the civilians there as role models. This is true about the average non-Muslims (or let's call them infidels, from an Islamic point of view) living there. People are more humane and genteel. And average Muslims have endless praise for them and their social systems. I have attended numerous such gatherings where this has been discussed.


    When some of the Europeans read about the doctrine of Islam, they do it very thoroughly. They thoroughly read about the Quran-e-Hakeem and about the life of the Prophet of Islam i.e. Muhammad (peace and blessings of Allah be upon him). And in doing so some of them choose to convert to Islam. We call them Muslims by choice. Such converts become better role models for the likes of us who are Muslims only by chance. And sometimes all of this happens as a consequence of ridiculous movies and peeving caricatures.

    Wednesday, November 14, 2012

    On The Brink of Death

    These days quite often we hear of death from various sources around us. Every now and then we hear someone died whose death may or may not have concerned us. There are people who are dying due to natural causes, accidents, bloody conflicts, terrorism, natural disasters and ship wrecks. Many people present various explanations for death and for the factors that may have caused it. This, in large part, depends on the cultural upbringing of people and specially on the religious conditioning he/she may or may not have undergone. Death is, somehow, a very frequent event of our life. I remember having googled statistics about death a few month ago to learn that every second one person dies and two are born on our planet. Death is nonetheless going to stay with us for so long as we are alive. 

    May be this inevitability and frequency of death has led us to extend our thoughts about what may or may not happen once we are dead. We have religious doctrines, on one hand, that try to give us an explanation about a possible afterlife. Almost each one of them is embellished with a notion of a heaven and a hell and an everlasting human soul that will reside in one of those places, possibly for ever. On the other hand we have scientific explanations for what may or may not happen after we die. Of these there are two that are most popular and are based somehow on empirical research and on thought experiments. One view is that as we die we live in an eternal oblivion and in an eternal nothingness forever. This is backed by a hypothesis, stretched out after careful research, that human beings do not have an immaterial soul and that the idea of a soul is a mental one, coined at some stage in the remote human history by human beings with a propensity towards believing in the unseen and the unseeable, specially to explain the cause of unprecedented events, and also to survive beyond burial and bodily death. According to the proponents of this idea, the mind ceases to exist as soon as the brain death occurs and all the mental ideas along with beliefs about whatever esoteric things had been held also vanish and cease to exist. Proponents of this idea have conducted research and they often leverage from the results and loop holes in others research. We have learnt to call such people with various names such as atheists, agnostics or skeptics, although the name atheist suits them the most, specially if they are that rigid about believing in what they want to believe.

    There is another classification of people who also leverage from science and their scientific training to show that a human soul, indeed, survives a bodily death and once we leave our bodies we keep on living forever in a so-called afterlife. The research that has been conducted and the body of knowledge that exists to support this line of argument has many dimensions to it. First, we have the spiritualists and psychics, who started addressing afterlife in the middle of the nineteenth century in North America and England. This group of people includes notable and renowned people of that time. Thus, one of the pioneers, Sir Alfred Russel Wallace, was a contemporary of Charles Darwin and the co-founder of his theory of natural selection. A careful review of the history and literature review of spiritualism suggests that it became an independent and a disparate body of knowledge even during its early years. Many spirit communication experiments were conducted and some notable members spent plenty of months in isolation to assess the feasibility of the enterprise and to contribute to the literature in the form of  books. The main reason why spiritualism flourished so much in the early years of its inception was also death. Another one of the early pioneers of the enterprise of spiritualism, Sir. Arthur Conan Doyle, states in his book titled, The History of Spiritualism, that frequent deaths due to war was the main reason to vest so much interest in this enterprise. Certainly, people die and their relatives want to know if they are doing well to where ever they have departed. Spiritualism, it turns out that, is widely seen as a religion in the West ever since its early days and its success in the area of spirit communication. A religion that tries to amalgamate and overshadow all the known religions that have a component of life after death appended to their respective doctrines. 

    Another group of people who belong in this class are the ones who leverage from the findings of the so-called near death experiences (NDEs) and out of body experiences (OBEs). In a laboratory experiment involving an NDE or an OBE the subject is rendered clinical death or comatose to an extent that he/she is almost dead, in a meaningful clinical sense. After being brought back to life the subject is investigated about his/her experience of that period of time. Indeed, this is thought not only to be a difficult process for the subject to undergo but also for the experimenters as well. Besides, the validity of the tests is questionable from various scientific and philosophical perspectives. There is a variety of subjects' experiences, as have been reported in the literature. While most of the subjects have reported utopian experiences, it must be accepted that some subjects have reported nothingness too. The tests and their results, clearly, have to be conducted and reported, respectively, with a great deal of perfectionism as it can be supposed, fairly, that they have grave consequences on the well being of society as a whole. 

    The conclusion, nonetheless, is that this latter class of scientifically motivated people have come to believe, as suggested by empirical research, that there is something after death. And that even though human beings may undergo bodily death, human consciousness tends to live on forever. We  can still, however, safely believe that the topic of afterlife is an open question, subject to further scientific scrutiny. 


    This, all of a sudden, heightened interest in the nature of afterlife, in the western circles has many aspects to it. Some of them are intuitive and others can be thought that may have philosophical repercussions. Indeed an interest in the science of afterlife prevails in the oriental mindset as well. I have personally heard many common people talk about the western scientific endeavors about the nature of afterlife and about some of the simplistic methods that may have been adopted; such as fixing video cameras in the graves to know if actually anything supernatural, like any angels coming to the dead and asking various questions, happened. It may be argued that when common religious people, who do not have direct access to scientific method and apparatus and, above that, who do not have any scientific training, read and discuss such accounts of the western researchers' endeavors about knowing the plight of the dead and not being able to get a clue, whatsoever, about the internal happenings of the grave, have a propensity to alluding it as limit of the power of science and the excellence of religion in being esoteric. I believe that this propensity is wrong. West needs to be complimented a great deal in the way it has progressed scientific research over the past few centuries.  

    In our era to vest an interest in knowing about a possible afterlife has many motives to it. First and foremost of these reasons is what was pointed out by Sir. Arthur Conan Doyle. That is, death. We live in a highly connected world where deaths are taking place around us all the time. We are encouraged to deal it with in different ways in so many ways to soothe our agonies. Thus, it is very common to hear in a western country the common slogan that life is short and that it should be enjoyed to the fullest, something in which there is no harm. Similarly, religion offers many antidotes to death. Islam, for instance, encourages everyone to live every day as the last one. 

    A very major concern in knowing about the nature of afterlife is that the nature of the latter, if one exists, or if it does not exist, can be vital in shaping and modeling the present ephemeral life. Indeed, any concrete knowledge about the nature of afterlife can be extremely useful in influencing human behavior. For, if we were to find out great evidence supporting the idea that we are destined to live in eternal oblivion once we are dead does not only mean a huge victory  for the atheists, it also means a great loss of equal proportions to the religiously inclined, spiritualists, and NDE and OBE sympathizers. The more indoctrinated you are, the more the magnitude of the feelings. Even though I think and believe that there is no harm in knowing the truth. For instance, there is no harm in believing the theory of nothingness if it were found, with compelling evidence, that this is what a human being is destined to be. The viable question then would be to wonder about how to effectively live this current, short and otherwise pointless life, specially in an otherworldly sense. A bad option may be to completely mess it up. A better option would be to shape it nicely, specially by leveraging from some nice examples, such as, as I presume, may have been laid out in The Moral Landscape

    Finding out that an afterlife exists does not rule out the reality that science is a useful enterprise. The idea that science has come to the brink of death just by there being a possibility of an afterlife is probably a foolish one. Obviously, in a philosophical sense, science may be considered to be less valuable if the present life is minute as compared to the next one. Some people may naturally get inclined to improving their afterlives as opposed to their present plight. Some people may still hate their current state of affairs for reasons known to them despite all the worldly endowments they may have at their hands. But people may still hate to live even if they knew that they were destined to nothingness. After all, people living in the western countries have had a greater propensity towards committing suicide in the absence of reasonable stimuli. But the possibility that there is an afterlife does not render science useless or bring it to a brink of death; it only possibly makes it a little less useful.

    Similarly, any finding that contradicts popular and deeply held notions should not be ruled out just for the sake of its being idiosyncratic. As a personal opinion this applies to people of all schools of thoughts. Open-mindedness is virtue. Scientific theories evolve and devolve to refine, accept or to reject previous developments.

    A conspicuous contradiction to this is the religion itself which remains inflexible to any criticism that is thrown towards it. It must be accepted that the religious, if not the religion itself, have a bad tendency about endorsing every scientific finding that agrees with their religious doctrine and rejecting vigorously whatever is in conflict with science. This must be discouraged. I remember having read an account in the Big Bang by Simon Singh, once upon a time, that when some Pope (possibly Pope John Paul) endorsed the big bang theory, Bishop Lamaitre, one of the pioneers of the theory, discouraged it. The very rational and understandable reason given for that was that science is an enterprise that is in constant flux all the time. And that as much as it may be a source of great happiness for the believers for a scientific theory of great significance to agree with their beliefs about the creation of the universe, it may be a cause of an agony of equal proportions if a latter scientific theory were to refute the former one with a lot more clarity. This is something that happens in Muslim circles too. Thus, every once in a while one gets to hear sermons in which glorious achievements of science are told with much pride which seem to endorse the Islamic ideas. This does sound absurd since normally the deliverer of the sermon has little or no formal education in science.

    I am not sure about Islam's stand on theological skepticism. Of course, it makes a lot of sense to believe that Islam would discourage such an idea. According to Islam a believer is expected to strive to increase his faith in Allah as the sole God and Muhammad (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) as his last and final prophet. I, however, read of a famous Islamic scholar and philosopher, Imam Ghazali (RA), also known as Algazel to the West. He formally introduced philosophical skepticism in Islamic philosophy.  According to his own account he practiced skepticism for a considerable while in his life. And after a while he became a firm believer when the God, most high, himself cast His divine light in to his heart. One may argue about the nature of that light or about the qualitative aspects of his conversion, or the ulterior motives there of. One may also argue, after establishing it as a fact, that his spiritual experience was of the sort of the myriad of fake NDEs. But it may as well be the case that he literally was enlightened by God himself. He may have adopted a strategy for that in parallel to his skeptic pursuits. May be he leveraged from a path synonymous with this. Nonetheless, Algazel is one of most revered sufi saints of medieval times. His work also inspired and influenced numerous well known western scholars of latter times. These include, and, possibly, are not limited to, Rene Descartes, David Hume, and Thomas Aquinas.

    If the claims of the afterlife enthusiasts are actually true and if there "is actually" an afterlife, it cannot be known, at the present moment, as to which religious doctrine, if at all, is true, This, however, does seem to mean a demise for atheism as to their claim concerning a "nothingness" after death has been rendered false. Obviously, only a formal, universally acceptable, proof of the existence of a supreme supernatural deity (aka God) can hammer the last nail in the coffin of this doctrine.

    Psyops: The Reality of European Spiritualists and Their Mi...

    Psyops: The Reality of European Spiritualists and Their Mi...: This article tends to present translations of important excerpts from the chapter titled " The Reality of European Spiritualists and Their ...